Rakdos Guildmage
Rakdos Guildmage is a Uncommon Creature — Zombie Shaman from Dissension (145) in Magic: The Gathering. Mana cost {B/R}{B/R}. Color identity: B, R. Cactaur's latest catalog snapshot shows a market reference near $0.80 for ungraded copies.
Who is this card for?
Rakdos Guildmage suits collectors and players working on Dissension who need the Uncommon slot. Compare listing photos to your target finish and confirm the Scryfall collector number before buying online.
What is Rakdos Guildmage from Dissension?
Rakdos Guildmage is a Creature — Zombie Shaman in Dissension numbered 145. Mana cost {B/R}{B/R}. Color identity: B, R. Rakdos Guildmage (145) from Dissension should be evaluated with set context, mana cost, color identity, and condition together. This printing is from Dissension.
What is Rakdos Guildmage worth today?
Cactaur tracks a market reference near $0.80 for Rakdos Guildmage. Low and high spread runs $0.80 to null. Per-finish references: cardmarket: $0.18; foil: $0.80; Normal: $0.12. This printing is from Dissension. Collector number 145 distinguishes this printing from same-name cards in other sets.
| Set | Dissension |
|---|---|
| Number | 145 |
| Rarity | Uncommon |
| TCGPlayer USD | $0.80 |
| Cardmarket EUR | €0.18 |
| cardmarket | $0.18 |
| foil | $0.80 |
| Normal | $0.12 |
Card stats
| Colors | B, R |
|---|---|
| Power | 2 |
How collectible is Rakdos Guildmage?
Rakdos Guildmage is a Uncommon printing in Dissension. Master set builders use collector number and set symbol to track completion progress. This printing is from Dissension. Collector number 145 distinguishes this printing from same-name cards in other sets. Catalogued rarity: Uncommon. The set released in 2006.
What are the key details for Rakdos Guildmage?
Rakdos Guildmage lists as Creature — Zombie Shaman. Artist: Jeremy Jarvis. Rules text is indexed in the catalog for search and deck research. This printing is from Dissension. Collector number 145 distinguishes this printing from same-name cards in other sets. Catalogued rarity: Uncommon.
Cactaur's take
Rakdos Guildmage (145) from Dissension should be evaluated with set context, mana cost, color identity, and condition together.
Pros
- Rakdos Guildmage is catalogued as Uncommon Creature — Zombie Shaman in Dissension, making set and collector number verification straightforward.
- Public market data shows a reference near $0.80 across finishes (cardmarket: $0.18; foil: $0.80; Normal: $0.12).
- Mana cost {B/R}{B/R} and type line Creature — Zombie Shaman help deck builders confirm the correct printing quickly.
Cons
- Raw market prices vary by condition and finish — near-mint estimates are not slab grades.
Verdict: Use $0.80 as a benchmark, then adjust for finish, grade, and how quickly you need to buy or sell.
FAQ
What is Rakdos Guildmage from Dissension?
Rakdos Guildmage is a Uncommon Creature — Zombie Shaman from Dissension numbered 145 in Magic: The Gathering. Cactaur indexes set, rarity, mana cost, and market references for this printing.
How much is Rakdos Guildmage worth?
Cactaur's catalog snapshot shows a market reference near $0.80 for ungraded Rakdos Guildmage. Condition, finish, and recent sold comps can move realized prices above or below that benchmark.
What rarity is Rakdos Guildmage?
Rakdos Guildmage is catalogued as Uncommon in Dissension. Use the collector number and set symbol on listings to confirm you are buying this exact printing.
Is Rakdos Guildmage legal in Commander or Standard?
Rakdos Guildmage shows format legality in modern, legacy, vintage, penny based on our latest ingest. Always verify the exact printing and ban-list updates before registering a deck for an event.
Should I buy Rakdos Guildmage near mint or played?
Near-mint copies command the catalog reference near $0.80. Heavily played copies trade lower unless the card is a chase rare where any clean copy is scarce.
Related cards
- Aurora Eidolon — Dissension
- Guardian of the Guildpact — Dissension
- Verdant Eidolon — Dissension
- Aethermage's Touch — Dissension
- Anthem of Rakdos — Dissension
- Assault Zeppelid — Dissension